Section 1983 & Police Misconduct
Unlawful arrests, excessive force, retaliation, and other constitutional violations by police and government officials.
Grable PLLC · San Antonio, Texas
San Antonio Civil Rights & Anti-SLAPP Attorney
Grable PLLC is a civil rights law firm in San Antonio, Texas. Attorney Brandon J. Grable represents people in Section 1983 police misconduct, First Amendment, and anti-SLAPP (TCPA) cases in state and federal court and on appeal, across Texas.
Section 1983 police misconduct, TCPA defense, and creator rights. Trial and appellate advocacy from a combat veteran, serving clients across Texas.
How we help
Focused on Your Constitutional Rights
Anti-SLAPP (TCPA) Defense
Sued for speaking out? The Texas Citizens Participation Act can end meritless suits early and shift fees.
YouTube & Content Creators
First Amendment, defamation, TCPA, and the right to record police and public officials.
First Amendment Rights
Speech retaliation, recording police, protests, public employee speech, and anti-SLAPP defense.
Second Amendment Rights
Section 1983 challenges, unlawful firearm seizures, and getting seized firearms returned.
Based in San Antonio, Grable PLLC serves clients statewide across Texas, with select matters outside Texas handled pro hac vice or with local counsel.
Also: civil rights cases in San Antonio and across Texas, appeals, and business disputes.
Guides: qualified immunity · §1983 deadlines · recording police · TCPA 60-day deadline · malicious prosecution
Track record
Selected Results
Past results disclaimer: Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. Every case is different and must be evaluated on its own facts and law. Results described depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. Client testimonials are not a guarantee of any result.
First Amendment – Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Salvaggio
U.S. District Court, W.D. Tex., No. 5:20-cv-01168-FB (Oct. 30, 2020)
Temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction granted
Represented a Leon Valley city councilmember in a § 1983 suit challenging an effort to remove him from office.
First Amendment – Civil Rights Settlement
Zinter v. Salvaggio
U.S. District Court, W.D. Tex., 610 F. Supp. 3d 919 (2022)
$500,000 settlement
Represented First Amendment auditors detained or arrested by Leon Valley police while filming; the court denied qualified immunity on some arrest, detention and retaliation claims, and the case later settled.
Civil Rights – Fifth Circuit
Degenhardt v. Bintliff
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 117 F.4th 747 (2024)
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
Anti-SLAPP – TCPA Appeal
Drew v. Belver
Tex. App.—San Antonio, No. 04-20-00483-CV (2021, pet. denied)
TCPA dismissal affirmed on appeal; petition for review denied
Brandon has also obtained millions in civil rights settlements for clients.
Common Questions
What does a civil rights lawyer do?
A civil rights lawyer represents people whose constitutional rights were violated by police or other government officials. At Grable PLLC, that usually means claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive force, false arrest, or retaliation for protected speech, in state and federal court and on appeal. See civil rights cases.
Can I sue the police in Texas?
Often, yes. Under Section 1983, an officer who violated your constitutional rights while acting under color of state law can be sued personally, subject to defenses such as qualified immunity. A city or county can be liable only when its own policy or custom caused the violation. See Section 1983 & police misconduct.
How long do I have to file a civil rights claim in Texas?
Section 1983 claims in Texas generally must be filed within two years, because federal law borrows the two-year period in § 16.003(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. When the clock starts depends on the claim. See §1983 deadlines in Texas.
What is an anti-SLAPP motion in Texas?
The Texas Citizens Participation Act lets a person sued over protected speech, petitioning, or association ask a Texas state court to dismiss the case early. The motion generally must be filed within 60 days after service. See anti-SLAPP (TCPA) defense.
Where is Grable PLLC located?
Grable PLLC is at 12451 Starcrest Dr, Suite 206, San Antonio, TX 78216. Call (210) 963-5297 or email intake@grable.law. Office visits are by appointment only; calls and emails are accepted 24/7. The firm serves clients across Texas.
Client reviews
What Clients Say
Past results disclaimer: Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. Every case is different and must be evaluated on its own facts and law. Results described depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. Client testimonials are not a guarantee of any result.
"When my constitutional rights were violated, Brandon Grable was the only attorney who truly understood what was at stake. His military background gave him a unique perspective on my case, and his tenacity in the courtroom was remarkable. He fought for me like I was family, securing a result I never thought possible. Brandon doesn't just know the law – he knows what it means to fight for principles and for people."
Brandon at Grable Law was incredibly helpful in guiding me through my legal questions. He took the time to explain the law in a way that was easy to understand and helped me clearly see my options. His knowledge and patience made a big difference, and I truly appreciate the support. Highly recommend!
While in san antonio I found Mr grable very knowledgeable about my issues with public access and personal trespassing notices. I thanked him for all the knowledge and resources at my disposal.
Brandon and his staff did an excellent job with the legal process. The amount of research and detail that went into the lawsuit was eye opening. I would definitely hire him again.
Grable PLLC Blog
Your Rights, Explained
Sixth Circuit says a school's "cease and desist" letter to a parent critic plausibly violated the First Amendment
The Sixth Circuit held a school's cease-and-desist letter to a parent critic plausibly violated the First Amendment, and remanded that claim.
Second Circuit overrules a 1980 rule and holds that a dismissal without a conviction can support a malicious prosecution claim
The Second Circuit held a New York ACD can be a favorable termination after Thompson v. Clark, but the claim failed as pleaded (no post-arraignment seizure).
Seventh Circuit upholds an injunction against Indiana's extra union-dues hurdles for teachers only as viewpoint discrimination
The Seventh Circuit held Indiana's extra dues-deduction steps for public school teachers only were viewpoint discrimination and affirmed an injunction.
Talk with Grable PLLC. Call 210-963-5297 or email intake@grable.law. Calls and emails accepted 24/7.
Request a Consultation