Section 1983 & Police Misconduct
Unlawful arrests, excessive force, retaliation, and other constitutional violations by police and government officials.
SB 20 took effect this month, and it could criminalize digital art, animations, and AI content that never involved a real child.
A digital illustration of a judge’s gavel and justice scales in front of a glowing computer screen stamped with ‘CONTENT BLOCKED,’ symbolizing Texas SB 20’s restrictions on AI-generated art and free speech.
On September 1, 2025, Texas officially made it a crime to create, share, or even possess certain kinds of AI-generated art and animations. The new law, known as SB 20, targets “obscene visual material” depicting minors in sexual conduct — even if the child is fictional, computer-animated, or entirely AI-generated.
That means your artwork doesn’t need to involve a real person to land you in legal trouble. If you’re an artist, digital creator, or someone who shares content online, this law could affect you in ways you never expected.
What Did SB 20 Change?
The law treats digital depictions of minors — even when no child exists — the same as traditional child pornography.
Not just creation or distribution. If you possess questionable content, you could face prosecution.
Applies to artists, platforms, and ordinary individuals. The net is wide, and intent doesn’t matter.
The First Amendment protects most expression. Laws that criminalize content must be very narrowly written. Critics say SB 20 sweeps in too much — potentially banning art, satire, or fictional works that never harmed anyone.
What counts as “obscene” or “visual material”? The law doesn’t spell it out clearly. That vagueness creates uncertainty for artists, businesses, and users alike.
Because the law equates AI imagery with child exploitation, it risks punishing individuals for works that don’t involve real victims. Legal scholars warn this could become a
“thought crime” statute.
An illustration divided into three panels showing the groups most at risk under Texas SB 20: a digital artist working on a tablet, a business professional managing a platform, and an ordinary user shocked by a warning on their laptop.
Stylized characters, fantasy art, or youthful-looking figures could be flagged.
Content moderation policies may need immediate tightening to avoid liability.
Sharing or storing the wrong file — even unknowingly — could trigger criminal charges.
Consult a lawyer immediately if you receive notice of investigation.
Preserve evidence — deleting files before speaking with counsel can complicate your defense.
Audit your practices — whether you’re an artist or a platform, review your content policies.
Don’t assume intent protects you — the law doesn’t require malicious purpose.
At Grable PLLC, we focus on civil rights litigation, constitutional law, and appellate practice.
We’re closely tracking SB 20 and preparing for the legal challenges it will inevitably face.
We can help you:Evaluate your risk under SB 20.
Defend against charges or investigations.
Challenge unconstitutional enforcement in higher courts.
Free speech isn’t gone in Texas — but the margins just got narrower. SB 20 pushes the boundaries of what the state can criminalize, and courts will soon decide whether it goes too far.
Until then, artists, creators, businesses, and everyday users should be cautious.
What feels like harmless digital art today could suddenly be treated as criminal under this new law.
👉 If you’re concerned about how SB 20 may affect you or your business, reach out to
Grable PLLC. We’re here to protect your rights.
Unlawful arrests, excessive force, retaliation, and other constitutional violations by police and government officials.
Sued for speaking out? The Texas Citizens Participation Act can end meritless suits early and shift fees.
First Amendment, defamation, TCPA, and the right to record police and public officials.
Section 1983 challenges, unlawful firearm seizures, and getting seized firearms returned.
See also: case results and case updates.
What Texas’s New AI Law Means for Police Identification, Biometric Data, and Your Constitutional Rights
The appeal did not decide whether the facial-recognition search was constitutional. But the case confirms that this technology is no longer a hypothetical issue for Texans.
How Geofence Warrants Work—and What the Supreme Court’s New Decision Means for Your Privacy
Instead of searching for a known suspect, investigators can use a geofence warrant to request information about devices located near the crime scene during a specific period of time.
How to Request Bodycam Video—and Why Police Departments May Refuse to Release It
But obtaining police body camera footage in Texas is not always simple. Even when a recording clearly exists, a law enforcement agency may delay its release, redact portions of it, or ask…
Talk with Grable PLLC. Call 210-963-5297 or email intake@grable.law.
Request a Consultation